Advanced usage
Advanced usage and various topics. Interpret this as loose recommendations for most people, and feel free to disregard if it doesn’t work for your setup!
Debugging
To enable debugging, set DEBUG=openapi-ts:*
as an env var like so:
$ DEBUG=openapi-ts:* npx openapi-typescript schema.yaml -o my-types.ts
To only see certain types of debug messages, you can set DEBUG=openapi-ts:[scope]
instead. Valid scopes are redoc
, lint
, bundle
, and ts
.
Note that debug messages will be suppressed if the output is stdout
.
Enum extensions
x-enum-varnames
can be used to have another enum name for the corresponding value. This is used to define names of the enum items.
x-enum-descriptions
can be used to provide an individual description for each value. This is used for comments in the code (like javadoc if the target language is java).
x-enum-descriptions
and x-enum-varnames
are each expected to be list of items containing the same number of items as enum. The order of the items in the list matters: their position is used to group them together.
Example:
ErrorCode:
type: integer
format: int32
enum:
- 100
- 200
- 300
x-enum-varnames:
- Unauthorized
- AccessDenied
- Unknown
x-enum-descriptions:
- "User is not authorized"
- "User has no access to this resource"
- "Something went wrong"
Will result in:
enum ErrorCode {
// User is not authorized
Unauthorized = 100
// User has no access to this resource
AccessDenied = 200
// Something went wrong
Unknown = 300
}
To generate in this fashion, --enum
needs to be specified on the command line.
Alternatively you can use x-enumNames
and x-enumDescriptions
(NSwag/NJsonSchema).
Styleguide
Loose recommendations to improve type generation.
Redocly rules
To reduce errors in TypeScript generation, the following built-in rules are recommended to enforce in your Redocly config:
Rule | Setting | Reason |
---|---|---|
operation-operationId-unique | error | Prevents invalid TS generation |
operation-parameters-unique | error | Prevents missing params |
path-not-include-query | error | Prevents missing params |
spec | 3.0 or 3.1 | Enables better schema checks |
Embrace snake_case
in JS
Different languages have different preferred syntax styles. To name a few:
snake_case
SCREAMING_SNAKE_CASE
camelCase
PascalCase
kebab-case
It’s tempting to want to rename API responses into camelCase
that most JS styleguides encourage. However, avoid renaming because in addition to being a time sink, it introduces the following maintenance issues:
- ❌ generated types (like the ones produced by openapi-typescript) now have to be manually typed again
- ❌ renaming has to happen at runtime, which means you’re slowing down your application for an invisible change
- ❌ name transformation utilities have to be built & maintained (and tested!)
- ❌ the API probably needs
snake_case
for requestBodies anyway, so all that work now has to be undone for every API request
Instead, treat “consistency” in a more holistic sense, recognizing that preserving the API schema as-written is better than adhering to JS style conventions.
Enable noUncheckedIndexedAccess
in TSConfig
Enable compilerOptions.noUncheckedIndexedAccess
in TSConfig (docs) so any additionalProperties
key will be typed as T | undefined
.
The default behavior of Additional Properties (dictionaries) will generate a type of Record<string, T>
, which can very easily produce null reference errors. TypeScript lets you access any arbitrary key without checking it exists first, so it won’t save you from typos or the event a key is just missing.
Be specific in your schema
openapi-typescript will never produce an any
type. Anything not explicated in your schema may as well not exist. For that reason, always be as specific as possible. Here’s how to get the most out of additionalProperties
:
Schema | Generated Type | |
---|---|---|
❌ Bad | yaml
| ts
|
❌ Less Bad | yaml
| ts
|
✅ Best | yaml
| ts
|
When it comes to tuple types, you’ll also get better results by representing that type in your schema. Here’s the best way to type out an [x, y]
coordinate tuple:
Schema | Generated Type | |
---|---|---|
❌ Bad | yaml
| ts
|
❌ Less Bad | yaml
| ts
|
✅ Best | yaml
— or — yaml
| ts
|
Use oneOf
by itself
OpenAPI’s composition tools (oneOf
/anyOf
/allOf
) are powerful tools for reducing the amount of code in your schema while maximizing flexibility. TypeScript unions, however, don’t provide XOR behavior, which means they don’t map directly to oneOf
. For that reason, it’s recommended to use oneOf
by itself, and not combined with other composition methods or other properties. e.g.:
❌ Bad
Pet:
type: object
properties:
type:
type: string
enum:
- cat
- dog
- rabbit
- snake
- turtle
name:
type: string
oneOf:
- $ref: "#/components/schemas/Cat"
- $ref: "#/components/schemas/Dog"
- $ref: "#/components/schemas/Rabbit"
- $ref: "#/components/schemas/Snake"
- $ref: "#/components/schemas/Turtle"
This generates the following type which mixes both TypeScript unions and intersections. While this is valid TypeScript, it’s complex, and inference may not work as you intended. But the biggest offense is TypeScript can’t discriminate via the type
property:
Pet: ({
/** @enum {string} */
type?: "cat" | "dog" | "rabbit" | "snake" | "turtle";
name?: string;
}) & (components["schemas"]["Cat"] | components["schemas"]["Dog"] | components["schemas"]["Rabbit"] | components["schemas"]["Snake"] | components["schemas"]["Turtle"]);
✅ Better
Pet:
oneOf:
- $ref: "#/components/schemas/Cat"
- $ref: "#/components/schemas/Dog"
- $ref: "#/components/schemas/Rabbit"
- $ref: "#/components/schemas/Snake"
- $ref: "#/components/schemas/Turtle"
PetCommonProperties:
type: object
properties:
name:
type: string
Cat:
allOf:
- "$ref": "#/components/schemas/PetCommonProperties"
type:
type: string
enum:
- cat
The resulting generated types are not only simpler; TypeScript can now discriminate using type
(notice Cat
has type
with a single enum value of "cat"
).
Pet: components["schemas"]["Cat"] | components["schemas"]["Dog"] | components["schemas"]["Rabbit"] | components["schemas"]["Snake"] | components["schemas"]["Turtle"];
Cat: { type?: "cat"; } & components["schemas"]["PetCommonProperties"];
Note: you optionally could provide discriminator.propertyName: "type"
on Pet
(docs) to automatically generate the type
key, but is less explicit.
While the schema permits you to use composition in any way you like, it’s good to always take a look at the generated types and see if there’s a simpler way to express your unions & intersections. Limiting the use of oneOf
is not the only way to do that, but often yields the greatest benefits.
JSONSchema $defs caveats
JSONSchema $defs can be used to provide sub-schema definitions anywhere. However, these won’t always convert cleanly to TypeScript. For example, this works:
components:
schemas:
DefType:
type: object # ✅ `type: "object"` is OK to define $defs on
$defs:
myDefType:
type: string
MyType:
type: object
properties:
myType:
$ref: "#/components/schemas/DefType/$defs/myDefType"
This will transform into the following TypeScript:
export interface components {
schemas: {
DefType: {
$defs: {
myDefType: string;
};
};
MyType: {
myType?: components["schemas"]["DefType"]["$defs"]["myDefType"]; // ✅ Works
};
};
}
However, this won’t:
components:
schemas:
DefType:
type: string # ❌ this won’t keep its $defs
$defs:
myDefType:
type: string
MyType:
properties:
myType:
$ref: "#/components/schemas/DefType/$defs/myDefType"
Because it will transform into:
export interface components {
schemas: {
DefType: string;
MyType: {
myType?: components["schemas"]["DefType"]["$defs"]["myDefType"]; // ❌ Property '$defs' does not exist on type 'String'.
};
};
}
So be wary about where you define $defs
as they may go missing in your final generated types.
TIP
When in doubt, you can always define $defs
at the root schema level.